Free
Learning, prototypes, and small experiments
$0
/ month
Generous free Postgres lane with autoscaling and branching available.
- 100 projects
- 100 CU-hours monthly per project
- 0.5GB storage per project
- 6-hour restore window
Tool Review
Neon
Serverless Postgres platform with autoscaling, branching, read replicas, restore history, and modern developer workflows. A strong option when you want Postgres infrastructure without adopting a whole all-in-one backend platform.
Updated on May 27, 2026 Best for: Teams that specifically want managed Postgres with modern branching and serverless deployment ergonomics. Backend & Database
Teams that specifically want managed Postgres with modern branching and serverless deployment ergonomics.
Pricing
Neon pricing
Neon is usage-based Postgres: compute, storage, restore history, branches, transfer, and plan capabilities drive the real bill.
Launch Featured
Production apps with intermittent load
Production path
Usage-based
Pay-as-you-grow plan with higher compute, storage, transfer, and restore-history capabilities.
- $0.106 per CU-hour listed on current pricing
- $0.35 per GB-month storage
- 7-day restore window
- 3-day metrics and logs in UI
Scale
Higher-scale Postgres workloads
Usage-based
Adds stronger limits, observability, networking, and compliance features.
- $0.222 per CU-hour listed on current pricing
- 30-day restore window
- 14-day metrics and logs in UI
- Private networking, IP allow rules, SLAs, SOC 2, HIPAA
Pricing notes
- Free is generous for experiments, but production apps should model compute hours, storage, branching, restore windows, and transfer.
- Launch is the likely path for production apps with intermittent load.
- Scale adds higher limits, longer observability retention, network controls, SLAs, and compliance features.
Capabilities
Feature highlights
Modern Postgres infrastructure
- Serverless Postgres with autoscaling, scale-to-zero behavior, pooled connections, read replicas, and storage separated from compute.
- Branching and restore workflows make databasechanges friendlier for previews, AI-generated app variants, and experiments.
- Postgres extensions like pgvector, PostGIS, and TimescaleDB keep the database useful beyond basic CRUD.
What Neon does not try to be
- It is not a whole Firebase-style app platform.
- Auth, storage, file handling, background jobs, and app logic are separate decisions unless you opt into specific Neon-adjacent features.
- You get a cleaner database layer, but you also compose more of the surrounding stack.
Comparison-friendly facts
Neon in one screen
Database model
Postgres-first, SQL-native, and strong for apps that expect relational data to matter.
Platform scope
Focused databaseinfrastructure, not a full backend suite like Supabase or Firebase.
Branching and previews
Excellent fit for preview environments, AI-generated variants, and safe schemaexperimentation.
Pricing shape
Usage-based compute and storage means quiet apps can be cheap, but always model production load.
AI builder fit
Strong if your agent understands Postgres and you want database branching without adopting a whole backend platform.
Recent updates
Neon updates to track
May 27, 2026 Neon pricing high impact
Pricing refreshed for Free, Launch, and Scale
Neon’s current pricing page lists Free, Launch, and Scale plans with usage-based compute and storage, plus included branching, autoscaling, and restore-history capabilities.
Source →Neon is appealing when you want the database choice to stay clean and independent.
That is attractive for teams who like Postgres but do not want their database decision to automatically dictate the rest of the stack.
Where Neon fits best
For the Add a Database job, Neon is the focused Postgres pick.
It answers a very specific question: what if you want really solid managed Postgres without also buying a whole bundled backend platform?
That can be the right move when:
- your app clearly wants relational data
- you already have auth and storage choices
- preview databases would make development safer
- you want serverless Postgres economics
- you prefer composing the stack yourself
Where Supabase still feels easier
If you want auth, storage, permissions, realtime, and a friendlier all-in-one story for a smaller team, Supabase is usually easier to recommend.
Neon is more focused. That is a strength if your main need is excellent database infrastructure. It is less helpful if you were secretly hoping the database would also solve half the rest of your stack.
My quick take
Neon is strongest when you already understand that your app wants Postgres and you prefer composing the rest of the platform around it.
If you want the cleanest database-first option without unnecessary product sprawl, Neon deserves to be in the conversation.
Further reading
| neon.com | Neon pricing | |
| neon.com | Neon docs | |
| neon.com | Branching overview | |
| neon.com | pgvector on Neon |
Related Paths
Related jobs and alternatives
Updated May 10, 2026
Add a Database
When your app needs to save stuff, you'll need one of these...
Supabase Firebase Neon Turso
See rankings →
Updated May 18, 2026
Add Authentication
You need logins, sessions, and account recovery without accidentally turning your weekend into a security incident.
Clerk Firebase Supabase Auth.js
See rankings →
Updated May 8, 2026
Secure Your App
You don’t need a full security department for your vibe-coded side project, but you do need to fix the obvious stuff before bots discover it for you.
Socket Cloudflare Turnstile Arcjet
See rankings →
Supabase
The Postgres development platform: database, auth, storage, realtime, and edge functions in one dashboard. A Firebase-like developer experience powered by Postgres and open source building blocks.
Firebase
Google’s app development platform for building, shipping, and monitoring web and mobile apps. Batteries-included backend services: databases, auth, hosting, storage, functions, analytics, crash reporting, and more.
Turso
Distributed SQLite database platform built around libSQL, hosted databases, embedded sync, and lightweight app data workflows. Interesting when your app fits SQLite ergonomics but still needs a cloud deployment and scaling story.